Comments on: FCoE Multi-hop : Why wait?

By: Interesting FCOE/DCB analogy «

Interesting FCOE/DCB analogy « — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:35:58 +0000

[...] http://nickapedia.com/2010/03/19/fcoe-multi-hop-why-wait/ [...]

By: FCoE vs. iSCSI: The Cagefight! – Performance « J Metz's Blog

FCoE vs. iSCSI: The Cagefight! – Performance « J Metz's Blog — Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:24:41 +0000

[...] helpers open the letter and hand it to him. That’s the FCoE metaphor. (Actually, here’s a much better – and visually appealing – description). How many [...]

By: nick

nick — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:03:06 +0000

Yup. Good news all around.

Make sure everyone knows that TCP/IP is shorthand for the IP protocol suite (multiple protocols within). The changes outside of Ethernet will likely soon follow the expansion of Ethernet itself.

By: PiroNet

PiroNet — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:25:16 +0000

DCB task group at IEEE creates a stronger/better/more reliable than ever TCP/IP protocol to allow convergence and FCoE… We can onkly benefit from this new technology since TCP/IP has been left out with no improvment for the last 10 years (exception with IPv6 but it hasn’t take off yet…)
Rgds,
Didier

By: Top 5 Planet V12n blog posts week 11 | VMvisor

Top 5 Planet V12n blog posts week 11 | VMvisor — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:55:10 +0000

[...] Weaer – FCoE Multi-hop: Why Wait?Let me visualize it for you. I want you to picture a FedEx Express truck. It has a simple job. It is [...]

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:10:22 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by lynxbat: new [blog] post: “FCoE Multi-hop : Why wait?” – http://bit.ly/a221mv – RT if you like…

By: vin

vin — Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:32:29 +0000

Hi,

that was a good article, sync’ed in perfectly with my Chicken salad with ranch dressing lunch

Thanks dude